CCL Home > Reports & Data > Lessons in Learning
Full article
Find more...
CCL news in your inbox: The Learning Link
Data suggesting that large numbers of working-age Canadians have inadequate literacy skills have prompted calls for improving literacy practices among children, youth and adults. For Aboriginal people, the need for improvement is especially urgent.
In 2003, Canadians participated in the International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey (IALSS). Results from IALSS were scored on a five-level scale with Level 3 considered to be the level required “for coping with the increasing skill demands of the emerging knowledge and information economy.”[1] Competence at or above Level 3 is associated with a number of positive outcomes, including better health, economic success, civic participation and opportunities for lifelong learning.
Among Canadians aged 16 to 65, 42% failed to meet this standard; among Aboriginal peoples, this number was even higher. In urban Manitoba and Saskatchewan, as well as in the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, the proportion of Aboriginal adults whose literacy skills fall below Level 3 is at least 16 percentage points higher than for their non-Aboriginal counterparts (see [Figure 1).*
* It should be noted, however, that the IALLS is conducted only in English and French and was not available in any Aboriginal language. This is especially critical for Inuit living in Nunavut, for example, where 65% of Inuit adults over the age of 15 primarily speak Inuktitut at home.
Data on adult literacy skills among Aboriginal populations are scarce; however, the 2003 International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey collected data from large enough samples of Aboriginal people living in urban areas in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, as well as Aboriginal people living in selected communities in the territories, to answer key questions about the literacy proficiency of these populations.
For all Canadians, weak literacy skills are associated with poorer labour-force outcomes. For example, while 77% of working-age Canadians with literacy skills at or above Level 3 are employed, only 66% of those with literacy skills below Level 3 are employed.
For Aboriginal adults, the employment gap between those with strong and those with weaker literacy skills is even greater. For example, among First Nations in urban Saskatchewan, 65% of those at or above Level 3 are employed versus only 31% for those below Level 3 (see Figure 2).
Source: Statistics Canada, IALSS 2003, (from Literacy profile of off-reserve First Nations and Métis people living in urban Manitoba and Saskatchewan)
Education contributes to stronger literacy skills among both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples: among both groups, those with higher levels of education generally have stronger literacy skills. As Figure 3 illustrates, education reduces the literacy gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations and, in the case of Métis living in urban Manitoba, eliminates the gap entirely.
Negative educational experiences and poor educational outcomes contribute to the literacy gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations. For example, in 2006 while 15% of the non-Aboriginal adults (aged 25 to 64) in Canada had not completed high school, more than one in three (34)% Aboriginal adults do not have a high-school diploma or degree. [2] There are a number of reasons for poor educational outcomes among Aboriginal populations in Canada. Among the barriers to success articulated by Aboriginal students and educators are discrimination and institutional insensitivity toward Aboriginal cultures[3] and lack of awareness of Aboriginal approaches to learning.[4] Other factors have been identified as barriers to learning for all struggling students, regardless of ancestry. These include a lack of school readiness,[5] absenteeism and mobility.[6]
Addressing the educational challenges faced by many Aboriginal students is a critical component of improving literacy skills among Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Several different approaches show promise of addressing the challenges.
As education systems across Canada struggle to meet the needs of Aboriginal students, many Aboriginal groups have expressed their desire to create their own measures of progress and success in learning and education, rather than being held to standards to which they do not necessarily ascribe. “One size does not fit all; there are many kinds of learners, many kinds of learning, and many ways of demonstrating our accomplishments. Without better research and data, we won’t know where we are, where we want to go, and if we’re getting there.”[31]
In collaboration with the Canadian Council on Learning, members of First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities have developed three lifelong learning models to be used as frameworks for measuring the lifelong learning progress of Aboriginal peoples.[32] Ongoing work will focus on identifying appropriate indicators with which to apply these models.
Low literacy is one of many challenges facing Aboriginal communities across Canada. Addressing the underlying causes of low literacy can contribute to overcoming many of these challenges: “When we use traditional methods of teaching and learning by and for Aboriginal people, literacy nurtures a positive identity, and connects us to the land, to our families, to our communities, to our languages and to our ancestors.”[33]
[1] Statistics Canada, Building on our competencies: Canadian results of the international adult literacy and skills survey, 2003 (Ottawa: 2003). Catalogue no. 89-617-XIE, p. 56.
[2] Statistics Canada, Educational portrait of Canada, 2006 Census. (Ottawa: 2008), catalogue no. 97-560-X.
[3] Malatest, R.A. & Associates Ltd. (2004). Aboriginal peoples and post-secondary education: What educators have learned. Montreal: Canada Millennium Scholarship Foundation. Accessed July 29, 2008.
[4] G.S. Aikenhead, "Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum". Science Education, 81, (1997), pp. 217-238.
[5] L.C. Huffman, S.L. Mehlinger & A.S. Kerivan, Risk factors for academic and behavioral problems at the beginning of school (2000). In L.C. Huffman (Ed) Off to a Good Start. Chapel Hill, N.C.: FPG Child Development Center of the University of North Carolina. Accessed July 29, 2008.
[6] C. Aman & C. Ungerleider, Aboriginal students and K-12 school change in British Columbia. Horizons 10(1), (2008), pp. 31-33. Accessed July 29, 2008.
[7] D. Corson, "Community-based education for indigenous cultures", Language Culture and Curriculum, (1998), volume 11, p. 3.
[8] X. Fan & M. Chen, "Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis". Educational Psychology Review,13(1), (2001), pp. 1-22.
[9] J.L. Epstein & S.L. Dauber, "School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools". The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 91, No. 3, Special Issue: Educational Partnerships: Home-School Community, (1991). pp. 289-305.
[10] J.P. Comer, School power. New York: The Free Press, (1980).
[11] A. Holm & W. Holm, "Rock Point: A Navajo way to go to school: A valediction". In C. Cazden and C. Snow (Eds) English Plus: Issues in Bilingual Education (pp. 170-184). Newbury Park: Sage, (1990).
[12] J.S. Eccles & R.D. Harold, "Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years". Teachers College Record, 94(3), (1993), pp. 568-587.
[13] V. St. Denis & E. Hampton, Literature review on racism and the effects on Aboriginal education. Prepared for Minister’s National Working Group on Education, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, (2002). pp. 49. Accessed July 29, 2008.
[14] T. Riley & C. Ungerleider (forthcoming) "Pre-service teachers’ discriminatory judgments". Alberta Journal of Educational Research.
[15] M. Ambler, "Without racism Indian students could be both Indian and students". Tribal College Journal, 8(4), (1997), pp. 8-11.
[16] British Columbia Human Rights Commission, Barriers to equal education for Aboriginal learners: A review of the literature, (Vancouver, B.C.: 2001).
[17] G.S. Aikenhead, "Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum".
[18] F. Marton, D. Watkins & C. Tang, "Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong". Learning and Instruction, 7(1), (1997), pp. 21-48.
[19] F. Mugler & R. Landbeck, "Learning, memorisation and understanding among distance learners in the South Pacific". Learning and Instruction, 10(2), (2000), pp. 179-202.
[20] N.J. Allen & F.E. Crawley, "Voices from the bridge: World view conflicts of Kickapoo students of science". Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, (1998), pp. 111-132.
[21] J. Guider, "Why are so many Aboriginal children not achieving in school?" Aboriginal Child at School, 19(2), (1991), pp. 42-53.
[22] D.M. McInerney, "Key determinants of motivation of non-traditional Aboriginal students in school settings: Recommendations for educational change". Australian Journal of Education, 35(2), (1991), pp. 154-174.
[23] L. Doige, "Literacy in Aboriginal education: An historical perspective". Canadian Journal of Native Education, (2001), 25, 120;127
[24] Saskatchewan Learning, Building partnerships: First Nations and Métis peoples and the provincial education system (2003).
[25] Saskatchewan Learning, Indian and Metis education policy from kindergarten to Grade 12, (1995).
[26] A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuals, (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.). Delaware: International Reading Association, (2002).
[27] S. Baker, R. Gersten & D.S. Lee, "Direct instruction: A behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged". In S. Bijon (dir.) Contributions of Behavior Modification in Education. Hilldale NJ, (2002), pp. 1-106.
[28] M. Pressley & V. Woloshyn, Cognitive strategies instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Second edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Brookline Books, (1995).
[29] J. Hotton, K. Monk, & S. Pitman, Students move 2: Best practice approaches and casesStudies from Australian schools, (2004). Accessed July 29, 2008.
[30] C. Aman, Exploring the influence of school and community relationships on the performance of Aboriginal students in British Columbia public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia, (2006).
[31] Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education, Moving forward in Aboriginal education: Proceedings of a national policy roundtable, (2005). Accessed July 29, 2008.
[32] Canadian Council on Learning, Redefining how success is measured in First Nations, Inuit and Métis Learning, (Ottawa:2007). Accessed July 29, 2008.
[33] T. Cordoba, Aboriginal literacy and education: A wholistic perspective that embraces intergenerational knowledge, (2006). Accessed July 20, 2008.
Data suggesting that large numbers of working-age Canadians have inadequate literacy skills have prompted calls for improving literacy practices among children, youth and adults. For Aboriginal people, the need for improvement is especially urgent.Des données laissant entendre qu’un grand nombre de Canadiens en âge de travailler présentaient des niveaux de littératie insuffisants ont donné lieu à l’amélioration des pratiques de littératie chez les enfants, les jeunes et les adultes. Au sein des collectivités autochtones, le besoin d’amélioration est particulièrement criant.
Des données laissant entendre qu’un grand nombre de Canadiens en âge de travailler présentaient des niveaux de littératie insuffisants ont donné lieu à l’amélioration des pratiques de littératie chez les enfants, les jeunes et les adultes. Au sein des collectivités autochtones, le besoin d’amélioration est particulièrement criant.